From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? |
Date: | 2002-04-12 23:04:06 |
Message-ID: | 11526.1018652646@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I think I made my point clear enough, that I consider calling
> these functions just once is plain sloppy. But that's just
> my opinion. What do others think?
I don't have a problem with the current length of the numeric test.
The original form of it (now shoved over to bigtests) did seem
excessively slow to me ... but I can live with this one.
I do agree that someone ought to reimplement numeric using base10k
arithmetic ... but it's not bugging me so much that I'm likely
to get around to it anytime soon myself ...
Bruce, why is there no TODO item for that project?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-12 23:24:21 | Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-12 22:59:33 | Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip |