From: | Andrew McMillan <andrew(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Poe <spoe(at)sfnet(dot)cc> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql and Software RAID/LVM |
Date: | 2005-06-06 06:48:45 |
Message-ID: | 1118040525.10586.172.camel@lamb.mcmillan.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 11:45 -0700, Steve Poe wrote:
> I have a small business client that cannot afford high-end/high quality
> RAID cards for their next server. That's a seperate argument/issue right
> there for me, but what the client wants is what the client wants.
>
> Has anyone ran Postgres with software RAID or LVM on a production box?
> What have been your experience?
Hi,
We regularly run LVM on top of software raid for our PostgreSQL servers
(and our other servers, for that matter).
As far as I can see these systems have not had issues related to either
software RAID or LVM - that's around 30 systems all up, maybe 8 running
PostgreSQL, in production. The database servers are a variety of
dual-Xeon (older) and dual-Opteron (newer) systems.
The Xeons are all running Debian "Woody" with 2.4.xx kernels and the
Opterons are all running "Sarge" with 2.6.x kernels.
Regards,
Andrew.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)803-2201 MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
The secret of being a bore is to say everything -- Voltaire
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PFC | 2005-06-06 11:45:39 | Re: SELECT DISTINCT Performance Issue |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-06-06 02:04:29 | Re: Most effective tuning choices for busy website? |