From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andrew Atkinson <andyatkinson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Samay Sharma <samay(at)tembo(dot)io> |
Subject: | Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2024-05-14 16:06:17 |
Message-ID: | 1106300.1715702777@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:05:01AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> My point is, in order to get that enhanced GitHub experience, you don't
>> actually have to commit these files into the individual source code
>> repository. You can add them to the organization and they will apply to all
>> repositories under the organization. This is explained at the above link.
> Oh, I apologize, my brain skipped over the word "organization" in your
> message.
FWIW, I'd vote against doing it that way, because then
maintaining/updating those files would only be possible for whoever
owns the github repo. I don't have a position on whether we want
these additional files or not; but if we do, I think the best answer
is to stick 'em under .github/ where they are out of the way but yet
updatable by any committer.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Wienhold | 2024-05-14 16:07:51 | Re: Underscore in positional parameters? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-14 16:03:13 | Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column |