| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | davec(at)fastcrypt(dot)com |
| Cc: | "'Christian Meunier'" <vchris(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug with sequence ? |
| Date: | 2002-02-04 17:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 11030.1012843746@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Cramer" <davec(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Mine manifests with the sequence being updated, and then another process
> comes along and tries to do the same operation and somehow gets the same
> sequence.
All I can say is I've been over the sequence code with a flinty eye,
and I'm darned if I can see anything wrong with it. I don't think
we are going to make much progress on this without being able to
investigate a failure with a debugger.
A self-contained example that shows a failure (even if only rarely)
would be really useful. Anything less really isn't useful.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian Meunier | 2002-02-04 18:13:27 | Re: Bug with sequence ? |
| Previous Message | bpalmer | 2002-02-04 17:19:46 | Re: v7.2 rolled last night ... |