From: | "Christian Meunier" <vchris(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug with sequence ? |
Date: | 2002-02-04 18:13:27 |
Message-ID: | 002101c1ada7$a51672a0$0200a8c0@hurrican |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Well correcting the report:
by the past, i was used to have this trouble ( using 7.2b5 or prior and
ipchains)
the only 2 occurences i have now in my log are not linked to sequence so it
must occur sometime somehow but it has nothing to do with postgres.
However by the past, i had this trouble with sequence, i dont know if i get
rid off this issue updating to 7.2RC2 or moving to IPTABLE instead of
ipchains.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christian Meunier" <vchris(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug with sequence ?
> "Christian Meunier" <vchris(at)club-internet(dot)fr> writes:
> > When i insert a new tuple i use: insert into test
values(nextval('test_num_=
> > seq'),......);
> > When i look at my postgres log, time to time i see:
> > 2002-02-04 08:11:47 ERROR: Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique
index=
> > test_pkey
>
> You sure that's the *only* way that the num column gets inserted or
> updated?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bpalmer | 2002-02-04 18:14:21 | Re: v7.2 rolled last night ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-04 17:29:06 | Re: Bug with sequence ? |