Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>
Subject: Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans
Date: 2025-04-02 18:09:16
Message-ID: 1101294.1743617356@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Anyway, I feel pretty good about this patch now and am quite content
> to stop here for PG 18.

Since feature freeze is fast approaching, I did a tiny bit more
cosmetic work on this patchset and then pushed it. (There's still
plenty of time for adjustments if you have further comments.)

Thanks for working on this! This is something I've wanted to see
done ever since we invented plancache.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-04-02 18:17:01 Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-04-02 17:48:48 Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.