Re: multi-backend psql

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multi-backend psql
Date: 2003-10-21 02:29:38
Message-ID: 1066703377.63032.75.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Going forward if we put the sql for all the psql commands into fuctions,
> then psql could be less tied to the backend version. I thought this was
> a TODO item already.

The tricky part seems to be dealing with i10n issues since the text to
translate would be release specific it needs to go into the backend --
but that isn't so nice.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-21 02:38:52 Re: libpq shared library version number needs a bump
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-10-21 02:25:10 Re: multi-backend psql