Re: multi-backend psql

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multi-backend psql
Date: 2003-10-21 02:25:10
Message-ID: 1066703110.7965.61.camel@zeutrh9
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 21:45, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Looks fairly straightforward to me. Just need to get backend version
> out. Maybe handle v2 protocol again. Then just have different SQL for
> different backends.

Going forward if we put the sql for all the psql commands into fuctions,
then psql could be less tied to the backend version. I thought this was
a TODO item already.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-10-21 02:29:38 Re: multi-backend psql
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-21 01:45:43 Re: multi-backend psql