Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> It also leaves the situation that we have a catalog view called
> pg_stat_bgwriter that would be accessing "checkpointer" things. That's
> really the thorny one that I wasn't sure how to handle. Good example
> of why we shouldn't expose internals too much.
Yeah, that's a bit unfortunate but changing it doesn't seem like a good
idea. The names I intended to change are all internal.
regards, tom lane