From: | Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On disable_cost |
Date: | 2024-10-08 18:29:30 |
Message-ID: | 104da494-03e7-4b14-9827-6a4b34c05466@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.10.2024 18:49, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 18:12 +0300, Alena Rybakina wrote:
>>>> However you are right that this display will not appear for all
>>>> nodes that only contain a data collection procedure, such as Append,
>>>> MergeAppend, Gather, etc. And I agree with you that we should
>>>> information about it. I also think it’s worth adding additional
>>>> information that this option does not appear in the postgres_fdw
>>>> extension.
>>> I cannot quite follow that either...
>> I meant this [0].
>> [0]https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpMyKJpLGWRmR3%2B3g4DxrSf6iRpwTRCXMorU0HvgWbocw%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Th disabled description won't display if the MergeAppend and Append
>> nodes are used in the query plan. I tried to generalize it, but without
>> success. I'm not sure that these nodes can be called accumulating data.
>> But I tried to describe this case in the documentation.
> You mean you rediscovered the bug that David's patch fixes?
Sorry, it works fine. I apparently tested the wrong version of the
patch. Sorry for noise.
>> About postgres_fdw extension disabled nodes won't show [1]. I think we
>> should add information about it too.
>>
>> [1]https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZRwy8202vxbUPBeZd_Tx5NYVtmpvBnJnOzZS3b81cpkg%40mail.gmail.com
> You cannot disable a foreign scan...
>
> Or do you want to see "disabled" if the remote query uses a disabled node?
> I think that would be out of scope...
>
Yes, you are right.
--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-10-08 18:50:52 | Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable) |
Previous Message | Marat Bukharov | 2024-10-08 18:12:22 | Re: [PATCH] Add min/max aggregate functions to BYTEA |