Re: Big 7.4 items

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com, patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, jrnield(at)usol(dot)com
Subject: Re: Big 7.4 items
Date: 2002-12-14 04:50:09
Message-ID: 1039841409.2629.18.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 20:20, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > This is a good point. I don't want to push Postgres-R as our solution.
> > Rather, I have looked at both and like Postgres-R, but others need to
> > look at both and decide so we are all in agreement when we move forward.
>
> I think in either way, it's clear that they need to be in the main CVS, in
> order for it to get up to speed.

Why's that?

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-14 04:50:52 Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-14 02:22:50 Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?