Re: Big 7.4 items

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mike Mascari" <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, <patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com>, <darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Big 7.4 items
Date: 2002-12-14 01:20:16
Message-ID: 00fd01c2a30e$f6f64700$0200a8c0@SOL
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This is a good point. I don't want to push Postgres-R as our solution.
> Rather, I have looked at both and like Postgres-R, but others need to
> look at both and decide so we are all in agreement when we move forward.

I think in either way, it's clear that they need to be in the main CVS, in
order for it to get up to speed.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Johnson 2002-12-14 01:28:24 Re: Big 7.4 items
Previous Message Iavor Raytchev 2002-12-14 01:16:18 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces