| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| Date: | 2002-08-13 18:11:27 |
| Message-ID: | 1029262288.13287.3.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> On a system where building with large-file support is reasonably
> standard, I agree that PG should be built that way too. Where it's
> not so standard, I agree with Andrew Sullivan's concerns ...
Agreed. This is what I originally asked for.
Greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cindy | 2002-08-13 18:15:38 | Re: question about upper limit on TEXT size |
| Previous Message | Jon Swinth | 2002-08-13 18:10:48 | Re: Transaction Exception Question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-13 18:16:49 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Previous Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-08-13 18:10:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |