Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ...
Date: 2000-01-09 16:17:31
Message-ID: 10184.947434651@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> NOTICE: Index word_url: Pages 16645; Tuples 5004183. Elapsed 3/9 sec.

> I'm curious about the Elapsed ... it took several minutes to before that
> pop'd up on the screen, which is why I ask...

That'd been bothering me too. A glance at the vacuum code makes it
clear that what's being reported is not elapsed time at all: the numbers
are user and system CPU time. OK, that's cool, but the wording of the
notice message needs to be changed to identify the numbers correctly.

Do we need to have actual wall clock time in there too?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-09 18:03:36 Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-09 15:50:28 Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ...