| From: | Manuel Trujillo <manueltrujillo(at)dorna(dot)es> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luis Amigo <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es> |
| Cc: | Jean Huveneers <j(dot)huveneers(at)farcourier(dot)com>, pg-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Maximum Performance |
| Date: | 2002-01-24 09:00:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1011862828.14774.10.camel@klingon |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
El jue, 24-01-2002 a las 09:27, Luis Amigo escribió:
> On my own experience I will tell you that if you're able to force postgres
> to keep all database in memory it will be very fast, so memory only depends
> on your
> database size.
> Each backend may run on a different processor, so the more processors u
> have the more backends u can run at once
> hope it helps
Yes, but... How can I know the exact size of my database? And, if I
compile the postgresql under four processors, don't work like (or in a)
SMP, distributing the charge into the four processors??
--
Manuel Trujillo manueltrujillo(at)dorna(dot)es
Technical Engineer http://www.motograndprix.com
Dorna Sports S.L. +34 93 4702864
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Helmberger | 2002-01-24 09:01:01 | Re: timing a process |
| Previous Message | Luis Amigo | 2002-01-24 08:27:09 | Re: Maximum Performance |