From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at |
Subject: | Re: stored procedure stats in collector |
Date: | 2008-05-14 02:02:57 |
Message-ID: | 10046.1210730577@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I wrote:
> I'm starting to look through this now,
I found another fairly big problem, which is that this stuff isn't even
going to begin to compile on Windows.
What I think we should do about that is forget tracking getrusage()'s
user/system/real time and just track elapsed time. We have the
technology to get that in a portable fashion (cf the well-proven
instrument.c code). Such a decision would also alleviate two of the
biggest negatives of this patch, which are the runtime overhead and
the extent to which it's going to bloat the pgstats file.
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-05-14 02:04:21 | Re: posix advises ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-14 01:55:53 | Re: Syntax decisions for pl/pgsql RAISE extension |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-05-14 02:04:21 | Re: posix advises ... |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-14 00:43:28 | Re: Making sure \timing is on |