| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |
| Date: | 2017-06-16 21:48:49 |
| Message-ID: | 10042.1497649729@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> writes:
> On 2017-06-16 20:11, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I assume though that Piotr wants an option to preserve that behavior.
>> I'm happy to write up a patch for bsdindent that adds a switch
>> controlling this, but is there any rhyme or reason to the way its
>> switches are named?
> I don't want to preserve the current behavior at all, but I might need
> to add an option for choosing one or the other if users of FreeBSD
> indent protest.
> I don't have a good name for it. The best I can do is -lpl ("-lp long
> lines too"). Can I see the patch?
Here's a patch. An alternative switch name might be -lpa ("-lp always")
but I'm not set on that.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| indent-lpl.patch | text/x-diff | 3.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-16 22:02:15 | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2017-06-16 21:43:54 | Re: Restrictions of logical replication |