| From: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)omnigres(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add Postgres module info |
| Date: | 2024-12-16 05:02:14 |
| Message-ID: | 0e82bf8c-ae70-498d-861e-dba2bb154cad@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/13/24 10:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/12/24 21:02, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
>>> 2. Any reasons to dictate MAJ.MIN format? With semantic versioning
>>> abound, it's rather common to use MAJ.MIN.PATCH.
>
>> Okay, thanks; that's a good catch. I wonder how to follow these rules
>> with a static fixed-sized structure. I would like to read about any
>> suggestions and implementation examples.
>
> There's nothing stopping a field of the magic block from being
> a "const char *" pointer to a string literal.
Ok, See v.2 in attachment.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Introduce-PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT-macro.patch | text/x-patch | 10.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-12-16 05:14:55 | Re: pg_combinebackup PITR comparison test fix |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-12-16 05:00:00 | Regression tests fail on OpenBSD due to low semmns value |