From: | lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SMP buffer management test question |
Date: | 2005-02-20 22:49:58 |
Message-ID: | 0IC800K0RIFAJ0@l-daemon |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks
Well I tried it out and on OS/2 using 8.0 it has the same problems as on
Linux, with two clients running on a dual PIII 750 both CPUs go to 100%
and the system is madly switching between the two processes. With a
single client, about 35% CPU is used.
Should the new buffer manager patch eliminate this behaviour? That is what
I gathered from the discussions.
Lorne
In <15517(dot)1108926080(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, on 02/20/05
at 02:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> said:
>lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca writes:
>> There was a mention of a "context-swap-storm" test in the posts on the ARC
>> patent. Where might I obtain a copy of this test procedure?
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-04/msg00280.php
>(The archiver seems to have lost the message's separation into parts, but
>the "setup" script is the part down through the checkpoint command.)
>Read the whole thread for context.
> regards, tom lane
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca
-----------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-21 01:28:50 | Re: SMP buffer management test question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-20 22:10:42 | Can we remove SnapshotSelf? |