From: | "Y(dot) NAKAGAWA" <nakagawa(at)goodf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system database |
Date: | 2020-10-06 09:44:43 |
Message-ID: | 03c101d69bc5$53380090$f9a801b0$@goodf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I had created a ticket #5875 on pgAdmin 4 redmine.
However, after some grep-ing on pgAdmin4 source tree, I found that [System
Database?] shows pg_database.oid <= pg_database.datlastsysoid.
pg_database:
on initdb-ed 12.4:
oid datname datlastsysoid
1 template1 13317
13317 template0 13317
13318 postgres 13317
on pg_upgrade-d 13.0:
oid datname datlastsysoid
13441 template0 13441
16400 template1 13441
16401 postgres 13441
Are these differences by design?
Regards,
--
Y. Nakagawa
-----Original Message-----
From: Y. NAKAGAWA <nakagawa(at)goodf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 1:11 PM
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system
database
Thank you for your suggestion.
According to pgAdmin4, [System database?] is [No] and [Template?] is [Yes].
I will post this to the pgadmin lists later.
Regards,
--
Nakagawa, Y.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 11:46 AM
To: nakagawa(at)goodf(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system
database
PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> 4. Open pgAdmin 4, connect to the PostgreSQL 13.0 server and expand
> the Databases node.
> Expected result:
> The node has [postgres].
> Actual result:
> The node has [postgres] and [template1].
There's no particular concept of a "system database" in Postgres, so I don't
know what pgadmin is doing to decide which databases to show or not show,
but evidently it's not too well thought out.
(The closest concept I can think of is whether a DB is marked datistemplate,
but a test confirms that pg_upgrade successfully preserves that property on
template0 and template1.)
I'd suggest you file this complaint on the pgadmin lists.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Godfrin, Philippe E | 2020-10-06 12:48:03 | RE: [EXTERNAL] BUG #16655: pg_dump segfault when excluding postgis table |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-10-06 07:48:44 | BUG #16656: Last update to PyGreSQL in Postgres repo drop python 2.7 support |