Re: Package naming conventions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm(at)poure(dot)com]
> Sent: 09 August 2003 21:56
> To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>
>
> On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:21, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> > ANYWAY: I am rebuilding betas with pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm and will
> > upload them during the night. It will take me some time
> because I have
> > to rebuild wxWindows as well. I missed the information to
> upgrade to
> > 20030722...
>
> Dear friends,
>
> Raphaël wrote me that the required wxWindows version was
> 20030707, this is OK
> for me. To sum up the RPM thing which differs slightlly from Debian:
>
> 1) CVS snapshots are numbered:
> pgadmin3-{version}-cvs{date}.rpm
> pgadmin3-0.9.0-cvs20030809.rpm
>
> 2) FTP uploads are numbered:
> pgadmin3-{version}-{build}.rpm
> pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm
>
> Build should be 1, 2, 3, etc...
> When you release a new {version}, the {build} goes back to 1.
>
> Agreed? On your reply, I will rebuild the packages.
> Cheers, Jean-Michel

Sounds good to me. Not sure the cvs in the snapshot names is needed, but I don't think it hurts.

Regards, Dave.