From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem with function permissions |
Date: | 2002-12-12 16:52:24 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128D5A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 12 December 2002 16:48
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function permissions
>
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > I would not have expected public to now have execute
> permission. Any
> > reason for this, or is it a bug?
>
> The default permissions for functions grant execute to
> public; the system is just instantiating that default when
> you do an explicit grant.
>
> The original implementation of function permissions didn't
> grant anything to public, but we concluded that that would
> break too many applications to be a reasonable default.
OK, thanks.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-12-12 18:33:37 | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-12 16:48:24 | Re: Problem with function permissions |