From: | "Reko Turja" <reko(dot)turja(at)liukuma(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres in freebsd jail |
Date: | 2004-08-17 07:01:35 |
Message-ID: | 019601c48428$08c2a9f0$6987cb52@rekon |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
> I was unable to get Postgres working in a jail even with this sysctl
> enabled. If you look through the archives, you'll see a discussion
> with
> others who have it working just fine.
>
> The upshot is that, personally, I don't know. I have not yet had
> time to
> track down the problem.
I guess you have set the following variables according your needs in
your kernel config file and then recompiled your kernel?
options SYSVSHM
options SYSVSEM
options SYSVMSG
options SHMMAXPGS=65536
options SEMMNI=40
options SEMMNS=240
options SEMUME=40
options SEMMNU=120
I don't have a system running -CURRENT or 5.x at this moment, so I
can't check if there are new sysctl's or kernel variables introduced,
which control the SYSV - One possible thing to do would be grepping
the output of sysctl -a and checking for word jail. (I tried to find
the thread you mentioned, but only found one post from you, so I'm
sorry if I'm just repeating the obvious...)
-Reko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-17 07:15:58 | Re: Does a 'stable' deferred trigger execution order exist? -> answer: yes |
Previous Message | Frank van Vugt | 2004-08-17 06:53:27 | Re: Does a 'stable' deferred trigger execution order exist? -> answer: yes |