Re: New Object Access Type hooks

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date: 2022-03-21 19:58:32
Message-ID: 0169FE2F-3448-4F13-A0D8-0982C4086EE6@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mar 21, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> My first inclination is to say it's probably ok. The immediately obvious
> alternative would be to create yet another set of functions that don't
> have classId parameters. That doesn't seem attractive.
>
> Modulo that issue I think patch 1 is basically ok, but we should fix the
> comments in objectaccess.c. Rather than "It is [the] entrypoint ..." we
> should have something like "Oid variant entrypoint ..." and "Name
> variant entrypoint ...", and also fix the function names in the comments.

Joshua,

Do you care to create a new version of this, perhaps based on the v2-0001 patch I just posted?


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2022-03-21 20:09:09 Re: jsonpath syntax extensions
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2022-03-21 19:57:34 Re: New Object Access Type hooks