| From: | "Chris White" <cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 |
| Date: | 2003-04-09 22:56:19 |
| Message-ID: | 013701c2feeb$3c8f2920$ff926b80@amer.cisco.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc |
Yes we are looking at the ability to recover from a power loss. However, we
only want to recover what we think has been committed to the database.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 3:45 PM
To: cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres
7.2.1
"Chris White" <cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
> Do you think I need to change the sync method for the
> database?
No, that's not relevant unless you are looking at failure to recover
from a power loss.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A.Bhuvaneswaran | 2003-04-10 09:57:43 | Re: HELP please.. |
| Previous Message | Adahma | 2003-04-09 22:53:29 | unsubscribe |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | agnes | 2003-04-10 01:27:20 | traversing an array column |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-09 22:45:18 | Re: [JDBC] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 |