From: | "Jelan" <jelan(at)magelo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: URGENT: pg_dump & Postgres 7.2b4 |
Date: | 2002-01-10 19:48:06 |
Message-ID: | 009301c19a0f$b9566b40$0200a8c0@hurrican |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dont panic, it was just a stupid try and i had saved the file and then
restored it ;)
If you could tell me how to figure out why Postgres is still trying to
access a segment it deleted, i ll do it and report it.
Thanks in advance
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christian Meunier" <jelan(at)magelo(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] URGENT: pg_dump & Postgres 7.2b4
> "Christian Meunier" <jelan(at)magelo(dot)com> writes:
> > Is there a way to clean up those commit log ?, i tried to remove 0002
but it
> > didnt help( it was then doing error on 0002 too)
>
> You did *what*?
>
> You may as well have done "rm -rf $PGDATA". You're hosed.
>
> I would have liked to look into why it was still trying to reference the
> 0000 segment after removing it; that suggests a logic problem somewhere.
> But with the database now completely nonfunctional due to loss of the
> active clog segment, there's probably no way to learn anything useful.
>
> Don't remove files when you don't know what they are.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-10 19:56:51 | Re: index and seq scan |
Previous Message | Andrew Perrin | 2002-01-10 19:41:44 | Re: Performance tips |