Re: feeding big script to psql

From: Havasvölgyi Ottó <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: feeding big script to psql
Date: 2005-08-02 09:24:28
Message-ID: 003801c59743$fc5f8a90$8000a8c0@OTTO
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom,

Thanks for the suggestion. I have just applied both switch , -f (I have
applied this in the previous case too) and -n, but it becomes slow again. At
the beginning it reads about 300 KB a second, and when it has read 1.5 MB,
it reads only about 10 KB a second, it slows down gradually. Maybe others
should also try this scenario. Can I help anything?

Best Regards,
Otto

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql

> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu> writes:
>> I know it would be faster with COPY, but this is extremly slow, and the
>> bottleneck is psql.
>> What is the problem?
>
> Hmm, does the Windows port have readline support, and if so does adding
> the "-n" switch to the psql invocation fix the problem? Or you could
> try feeding the script with -f switch or \i rather than "psql <script".
> Readline adds a fair amount of overhead, which is completely invisible
> at human typing speeds but can be annoying when reading scripts.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message in-consulting.net 2005-08-02 10:52:41 Why pgsql function is working on vers 8.0/windows and not on ver 7.3.2/rad hat?
Previous Message stefan 2005-08-02 07:56:52 Re: pgmonitor