From: | filip(dot)hrbek at plz(dot)comstar(dot)cz (Filip Hrbek) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] optimizing java |
Date: | 2005-05-26 08:21:43 |
Message-ID: | 003301c561cb$ff68a2b0$1e03a8c0@fhrbek |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
Hello,
Thomas, I promised making some reports of memory consumption, which seems
strange to me in some cases... I am sorry but I have too much commercial
work now, we are starting a new project and the project with pl/java has
been delayed a little. But I am sure I will do it (hope soon).
I do think that the startup time is really irrelevant if one makes a good
connection pool. Once it starts, the performance is very good.
Regards
Filip
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal at mailblocks.com>
To: "Marek Lewczuk" <marek at lewczuk.com>
Cc: <pljava-dev at gborg.postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Pljava-dev] optimizing java
> Marek Lewczuk wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to improve java VM startup overhead ? Now I use JDK
> > 1.5 and first execution of the pljava takes about 2-3 seconds. I have
> > heard that other (not from SUN) VM are much faster, is it true ?
>
> I'm sure there is. But a general rule of thumb is that the faster the
> startup, the slower the VM. The time the VM consumes at startup is often
> well spent.
>
> The absolute best approach is to minimize the number of startups (and
> the number of VM's). Make heavy use of a connection pool.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pljava-dev mailing list
> Pljava-dev at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-dev
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zoong PHAM | 2005-05-26 13:43:10 | [Pljava-dev] libpljava.so: failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-05-26 07:37:02 | [Pljava-dev] optimizing java |