RE: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list

From: "John Ridout" <johnridout(at)ctasystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'pgsql-hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list
Date: 1999-07-12 09:09:51
Message-ID: 000301becc46$4e80e640$0301010a@johnridout
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I can "select * from pgshadow" as the database owner.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 09 July 1999 17:41
> To: Hannu Krosing
> Cc: Gene Sokolov; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list
>
>
> > > But we don't, do we? I thougth they were hashed.
> >
> > do
> > select * from pg_shadow;
> >
> > I think that it was agreed that it is better when they
> can't bw snatched
> > from
> > network than to have them hashed in db.
> > Using currently known technologies we must either either know the
> > original password
> > and use challenge-response on net, or else use plaintext
> (or equivalent)
> > on the wire.
>
> Yes, I remember now, we hash them with random salt before sending them
> to the client, and they are only visible to the postgres user.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
> Pennsylvania 19026
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mattias Kregert 1999-07-12 11:33:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hashing passwords (was Updated TODO list)
Previous Message Maarten Boekhold 1999-07-12 07:56:54 Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Joins and links