| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? |
| Date: | 2025-03-05 16:06:10 |
| Message-ID: | zbuk4mlov22yfoktf5ub3lwjw2b7ezwphwolbplthepda42int@h6wpvq7orc44 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
In https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkYXSnM60ZNo-vQLxFoGzHLHFD0x%3DiPHF6VGxiZmWUuwQ%40mail.gmail.com
Peter wrote:
On 2025-03-05 09:37:05 -0500, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Committed just now. Thanks again.
But since had to revert, due to BF issues:
commit d00107cd63e780753aa25563fa37603369997d0c
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Date: 2025-03-05 10:27:31 -0500
Revert "Show index search count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE."
This reverts commit 5ead85fbc81162ab1594f656b036a22e814f96b3.
This commit shows test failures with debug_parallel_query=regress. The
underlying issue needs to be debugged, so revert for now.
Post-commit issues due to debug_parallel_query=regress seem rather common,
surely not helped by CI/cfbot not flagging them. I wonder if we ought to make
one of the CI tasks use debug_parallel_query=regress, to avoid that problem?
Greetings,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-03-05 16:10:03 | Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-03-05 15:52:22 | Re: Improve CRC32C performance on SSE4.2 |