From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: default privileges |
Date: | 2010-04-05 02:34:02 |
Message-ID: | z2u3073cc9b1004041934p2b736e7fx32431ab804cde10f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Not sure if this is good enough or we need to provide some more-obvious
>>> way of dealing with it.
>
>> it's strange that a REVOKE doesn't clean what a GRANT did, and DROP
>> OWNED BY seems very dangerous (at least if i forgot to make REASSIGN
>> OWNED first).
>
> Agreed --- I fixed it so that granting or revoking back to the default
> permissions set will remove the entry.
>
ah! now is working nice... thanks
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-05 02:50:40 | Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-05 02:17:42 | Re: Release Notes 9.0: substring() changes? |