Re: User permissions

From: "Lars Preben S(dot) Arnesen" <l(dot)p(dot)arnesen(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User permissions
Date: 2002-03-14 13:38:46
Message-ID: yfr663zs1zt.fsf@lpsa.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

[ Doug McNaught ]

> We had a nice little flamewar about this a few weeks ago. ;)

OK. I'll look into the arguments in the war...

> The "Postgres" way to do it is to lock the unprivileged user out of
> the "real" tables, and create views for that user to access. The
> views can include only the fields that you want them to see, and you'd
> create ON INSERT/DELETE/UPDATE rules to validate input and write to
> the actual tables.

Hmmm. I'm not going to start another flame war, but I think this seems
like it could be somewhat easier with the Oracle solution (at least
what I have heard from Oracle-users) that enables you to restrict a
database user only to execute predefined functions.

As I understand it I need to create functions, views and triggers to
get what I want.

> This is kind of a different way of thinking about it than the "proxy
> functions" concept but you should be able to do everything you want to
> do.

With programming, everything is possible. :)

--
Lars Preben

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lars Preben S. Arnesen 2002-03-14 13:40:12 Re: User permissions
Previous Message Dave 2002-03-14 13:36:19 JDBC Prepared Statement Bug