Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:

> Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be
> fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know? A client linked to 2.0
> might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)).
>
> Now, that doesn't directly effect the PostgreSQL RPM's. What it does
> effect is the guy who wants to install PHP from with PostgreSQL support
> enabled and cannot because of a failed dependency. Who gets blamed?
> PostgreSQL.
>
> Trond may correct me on this, but I don't know of a workaround for
> this.

There usually are no such problems, and I'm not aware of any specific
to postgresql either.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.