From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? |
Date: | 2002-01-30 15:50:05 |
Message-ID: | xuywuxzx2he.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The other day, I did a test build of "everything", which involved
> specifying 17 command-line arguments to configure. This is probably the
> reason why some fringe features are not tested very often: the list of
> options is pretty overwhelming.
>
> I remembered that in the old days PHP had an interactive setup script,
> that asked you mainly yes/no questions about each feature you wanted, and
> would run "configure" based on the answers it got. This sort of thing
> might help our situation, because instead of having to specify all the
> options, users can just keep pressing Y all the time. Of course it could
> also be considered as a general improvement in user-friendliness.
I hated that (same for perl).
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-01-30 17:21:00 | postgresql under Windows is slow |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-30 15:46:25 | Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too |