From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Date: | 2000-12-30 20:04:28 |
Message-ID: | xuyvgs1brqr.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> How different is the feature set? Otherwise, sounds like a great idea
> to me, and reduces the dependencies substantially -- and makes history
> available to all the supported platforms without requiring libreadline
> already installed.
It bloats on platforms having readline but not libedit.
As long as it isn't necesarry for postgresql to function, I don't see
any risk of tainting.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-30 20:08:46 | Re: Inheritance docs error. |
Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2000-12-30 20:04:16 | Re: oid failures on Alpha solved |