Re: Pl/Tcl problem

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, PgSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Pl/Tcl problem
Date: 2001-12-15 17:17:35
Message-ID: xuyu1usz9lc.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> But I'm not sure that this has anything to do with Alvaro's problem.
> The bogus choice of soname has doubtless been that way for awhile,
> and yet we've not had other complaints.

Biggest reason: Hardly anyone uses tcl.

We've shipped it that way, and there was one complaint month after we
shipped... Comparing that to feedback on other areas in the same
package, I just don't think the tcl functionality is used much. Tcl is
exactly all the rage anymore.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-15 17:59:18 Re: PostgreSQL & Object Oriented
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-15 17:13:41 Re: Pl/Tcl problem