Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Date: 2000-10-10 21:29:11
Message-ID: xuyog0so060.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> > OTOH, Red Hat, Inc. employs most of the gcc developers and by far the
> > most GDB developers(80-90% of commits). There are still mechanisms in
> > place to hinder that we have any sort of control over these...
>
> What sort of mechanisms? Perhaps we need to borrow some ideas from
> your situation.

Steering committees, where one entitity (university, company etc) are
restricted to a maximum quota of members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-10 21:34:49 Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR
Previous Message Martin Jacobs 2000-10-10 21:25:11 Re: Regression tests of plain 7.0.2 fails

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-10 21:39:48 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-10 21:25:08 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job