Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=d8d?=)
To: Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer(at)alphanet(dot)ch>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Brian C(dot) Doyle" <bcdoyle(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Date: 2000-11-30 21:11:39
Message-ID: xuyofyxupv8.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer(at)alphanet(dot)ch> writes:

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > Note that this is a Linux limitation ... and even then, I'm not quite sure
> > how accurate that is anymore ... the *BSDs have supported >2gb file
> > systems for ages now, and, since IBM supports Linux, I'd be shocked if
> > there was a 2GB limit on memory, considering alot of IBMs servers support
> > up to 4 or 8GB of RAM ...
>
> Linux 2.2.x on ix86 only supports files upto 2 GB.

This support has been backported as is available in some kernels
shipped with Red Hat Linux, and has been so for some time. Possibly
others.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Lang 2000-11-30 21:15:44 Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database - more info
Previous Message Dale Anderson 2000-11-30 20:54:26 Re: Table & Column descriptions

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-11-30 22:35:36 Re: I get an error with Foreign Keys
Previous Message Martin A. Marques 2000-11-30 20:34:08 Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?