Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >
> > When compared to the earlier ones (including XFS), you'll note that ReiserFS
> > performance is rather poor in some of the tests - it takes 37 vs. 13
> > seconds for 8192 inserts, when the inserts are different transactions.
>
> That is all the fsync delay, probably, and it should be using fdatasync()
> on that kernel.
And it does seem to work that way with XFS...
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.