From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> |
Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-06-27 21:01:19 |
Message-ID: | xuyithhd4dc.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:15, Alex Knight wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > > Disagreed over here, with 4+ years of experience 24x7 on RHL since RHL
> > > > 4.1.
> >
> > > This 4+ years 24/7 experience isn't on that server you said was for
> > > internal purposes with low load you mentioned in a previous post, is it?
> >
> > No. This one has been streaming our RealAudio stream 24x7 since May 1, 1997
> > (minus a few hours for maintenance -- you know, things like replacing failed
> > power supplies, replacing/installing hard drives, upgradingthe OS, etc.
> > Still running the same Super Micro dual PPro 200 motherboard -- but 192MB now
> > instead of the 64MB we started with. ECC, of course. Will be replacing with
> > the 'lightly loaded' PIII-600 w/ 1GB as soon as Real Networks supports kernel
> > 2.4.) -- along with mail, DNS, and seven domains worth of webservice. Not
> > terribly heavy loaded -- but we can and do saturate our T1.
>
> Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
> the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
> just doesn't cut it.
That claim is bogus. Red Hat Linux is the number one linux by far in
enterprise deployments.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-06-27 21:03:33 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Feite Brekeveld | 2001-06-27 20:52:56 | Re: vacuum job taking very long time to complete |