From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Keith F Irwin <kirwin14(at)home(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HELP! BUG? pg_dump mucks up grant/revoke |
Date: | 2001-08-06 18:46:03 |
Message-ID: | xuyg0b56n84.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> On Friday 03 August 2001 16:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> > teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> > > I'd hope for "yes", although the available patch should solve the
> > > problems for us (Red Hat Linux) as I'll add that.
>
> > Okay. If you're doing a rerelease of pg_dump, please also pick up the
> > REL7_1_STABLE commits I just made a few minutes ago; those clean up a
> > couple other bits of breakage...
>
> Whoa....
>
> A pg_dump that can't be restored should be a release forcer, IMHO. After
> all, we're talking about our only upgrade path here -- the last 7.1.x release
> _MUST_ be able to make a dump that 7.2 can reliably read!
>
> As PG 7.1 has never been released with an official Red Hat (it's in the
> Roswell beta, IIRC), 're-release' is a misnomer from RH's POV.
>
> I'm inclined to rerelease RPM's, though. Although I shouldn't call them
> '7.1.2' RPM's at that point -- although I have an intarray asynchrony now...
A set of RPMs with fixes from REL7_1_STABLE as of yesterday (and some
other minor fixes, related to the rpm) should be available from
http://people.redhat.com/teg/pg/
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rich Morin | 2001-08-06 22:14:44 | assorted documentation errors |
Previous Message | Jean Pierre LeJacq | 2001-08-06 16:04:41 | config.h inclusion conflict |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-06 19:09:45 | Re: Would a PostgreSQL database on a DVD be usable? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-06 18:39:35 | Re: Would a PostgreSQL database on a DVD be usable? |