Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: "Thalis A(dot) Kalfigopoulos" <thalis(at)cs(dot)pitt(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Brent R(dot) Matzelle" <bmatzelle(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-25 18:08:54
Message-ID: xuybsncig95.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" <thalis(at)cs(dot)pitt(dot)edu> writes:

> Always a first time for everything bad. Anyway, not wanting to be the
> pessimist of the bunch, I'll hold my horses and hope that none of my
> "fears" turns into reality. The issue is that none of the other open
> source projects RH supported was anything major they could make real
> money out of, at least not compared to what they can make out of the
> DB arena.

Uh? The database project is small FTTB (moneywise) compared to other
things like the kernel, gcc and glibc which are core parts of our base
product.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Hilliard 2001-06-25 18:27:27 It's Apache, not PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-25 17:52:48 Re: INNER JOIN ON vs ','+WHERE