| From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: List response time... |
| Date: | 2001-08-22 01:55:22 |
| Message-ID: | xuyae0sg8ol.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> writes:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
>
> > Mailing lists don't scale well to large numbers of subscribers. I see this
> > delay constantly,on multiple lists. The bigger the list gets, the slower the
> > list gets (and the more loaded the server gets, right Marc? :-)).
>
> Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail.
> In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much
> better choice to handle large mailing lists. When we switched from
> sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or
> sometimes even days, to seconds.
The MTA used for various redhat.com mailing lists is postfix (and
mailman as listmanager)
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-08-22 02:02:24 | Re: bugs - lets call an exterminator! |
| Previous Message | Dale Johnson | 2001-08-22 01:35:18 | Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal |