From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy(at)ata(dot)cs(dot)hun(dot)edu(dot)tr> |
Cc: | Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Turkish locale bug |
Date: | 2001-03-02 23:46:10 |
Message-ID: | xuy7l274tvh.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy(at)ata(dot)cs(dot)hun(dot)edu(dot)tr> writes:
> Justin Clift wrote:
> >
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy(at)ata(dot)cs(dot)hun(dot)edu(dot)tr> writes:
> > > > With Turkish locale it is not possible to write SQL queries in
> > > > CAPITAL letters. SQL identifiers like "INSERT" and "UNION" first
> > > > are downgraded to "ınsert" and Then "ınsert" and "unıon"
> > > > does not match as SQL identifier.
> > >
> > > Ugh.
> > <snip>
> >
> > How about thinking in the other direction.... is it possible for
> > PostgreSQL
> > to be able to recognised localised versions of SQL queries?
> >
> > i.e. For a Turkish locale it associates "ınsert" INSERT and "unıon"
> > with UNION.
>
> I don't have any opinion how can solve this problem. But,
> I don't agree with this solution. SQL is naturally English. I am
> against SQL to be localized.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 175 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-03 00:11:00 | Re: Re: Turkish locale bug |
Previous Message | pgsql-bugs | 2001-03-02 23:24:22 | polygon insert into r-tree sometimes fails |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-03 00:11:00 | Re: Re: Turkish locale bug |
Previous Message | Martin A. Marques | 2001-03-02 22:10:46 | Re: PostgreSQL for Solaris packages |