Re: 7.2b2 "make check" failure on Red Hat Linux 7.2

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.2b2 "make check" failure on Red Hat Linux 7.2
Date: 2001-11-19 16:47:45
Message-ID: xuy7ksmbtce.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:

> * Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [011116 16:56]:
> > teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> > > Since it works when prefix isn't /usr, I'd guess that the build
> > > process sets rpath. This takes precedence over LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
> >
> > > Fix? Don't use rpath - it's evil, and should be avoided anyway.
> >
> > Peter, any thoughts on that? It's not clear to me that removing
> > rpath settings would be an improvement overall, even if it makes
> > "make check" more reliable.
> My general take is rpath is a *GOOD* thing, as it prevents USERS from
> not being able to find REQUIRED shared libs.

Lib-directories should be listed in /etc/ld.so.conf, and no rpath used
- at least on linux.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-11-19 16:53:37 Re: 7.2b2 "make check" failure on Red Hat Linux 7.2
Previous Message mlw 2001-11-19 16:43:55 Re: postgresql.conf