Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: 2003-10-10 20:26:58
Message-ID: x7wubcon3h.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

>>>>> "NB" == Nick Barr <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:

NB> So far:

NB> shared_buffers = 1/16th of total memory
NB> effective_cache_size = 80% of the supposed kernel cache.

Please take into account the blocksize compiled into PG, too...

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2003-10-10 20:33:30 log_duration and \timing times repeatably much higher than "Total runtime" from explain analyze
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2003-10-10 20:15:43 Re: Table partitioning for maximum speed?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-10 20:38:18 Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2003-10-10 20:22:08 Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL