| From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Foreign key locks |
| Date: | 2004-09-02 20:59:46 |
| Message-ID: | x7sma02xq5.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "SS" == Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
SS> You really should just need to drop the constraints and recreate them, not
SS> the entire schema.
So do I want to do deferred checks on all transactions, or just
some/one of them? I'm assuming that if the advice is to make them
initally deferred that means all of them, but I wanted to be sure.
Thanks!
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-09-02 21:38:23 | Re: Can we return a table from a function? |
| Previous Message | Ennio-Sr | 2004-09-02 20:54:14 | "echo"ing a psql command in a bash script |