From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- merge tables |
Date: | 2004-09-14 18:27:46 |
Message-ID: | x7pt4ou2n1.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "MC" == Mark Cotner <mcotner(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
MC> I've finished porting the schema and am importing the
MC> data now. My estimates for just two-thirds(60 of the
MC> 90 days) of one of our 30 cable systems(MySQL dbs) is
MC> estimated to take about 16 hours. This may seem like
MC> a lot, but I'm satisfied with the performance. I've
be sure to load your data without indexes defined for your initial
import.
check your logs to see if increasing checkpoint_segments is
recommended. I found that bumping it up to 50 helped speed up my
data loads (restore from dump) significantly.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2004-09-14 19:27:55 | Re: Large # of rows in query extremely slow, not using |
Previous Message | aaron werman | 2004-09-14 18:20:50 | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- merge tables |