From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-24 15:14:00 |
Message-ID: | x7n0cucj7r.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
TL> Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> writes:
>> Ditto for me. Can you reproduce my results by increasing
>> checkpoint_buffers to some large value (I use 50)?
TL> You meant checkpoint_segments, right? It might be interesting to
TL> experiment with wal_buffers, too, though I'm not convinced that will
TL> have a big impact.
The difference on restore with fsync=false was 2 seconds. I'm
rebuilding PG with Marc's WAL-disabling patch and will see the change
there.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josué Maldonado | 2003-09-24 15:18:01 | Re: Is this "order by" logic right |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2003-09-24 15:10:37 | Re: Accessing tables from different databases |