Re: pgpool simple feature request

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)yertle(dot)int(dot)kciLink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgpool simple feature request
Date: 2005-02-08 20:49:42
Message-ID: x7mzuevkt5.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "TI" == Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:

TI> Yes, I thought about that too. Probably we need two kinds of
TI> initializations:

TI> 1) initilization for each new connection (as you requested)

TI> 2) initilization for each new client connection

I think this latter one is important. Take the case where I do some
"set FOO BAR" values to alter the query (eg, statement timeout or
sequence scan disable) which should be reset on new client connection
when it re-uses a backend connection.

Or is this magically handled already?

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-02-08 20:52:43 Removing duplicates
Previous Message awitney 2005-02-08 19:40:06 hi